Authority Network America: Network Quality Benchmarks

Network quality benchmarks define the measurable standards against which member sites and their referenced service providers are evaluated within the Authority Network America framework. These benchmarks govern licensing verification, credential currency, geographic scope accuracy, and data integrity across the network's eight member verticals. Understanding how these standards are structured — and where they draw enforcement boundaries — matters to service seekers, industry researchers, and professionals who rely on this network as a reference source.

Definition and scope

Network quality benchmarks are structured performance criteria applied uniformly across all member sites to ensure that referenced providers, service categories, and licensing data meet a consistent threshold of accuracy and completeness. These benchmarks operate at two levels: the site level, which covers how each member domain organizes, verifies, and updates its professional reference content, and the provider level, which covers the credentials, jurisdictional authorizations, and service scope of individuals and firms listed or described within those sites.

The scope of these benchmarks extends to all eight active member verticals — plumbing, HVAC, electrical, general contracting, roofing, pool and aquatics, and two cross-network reference platforms. A benchmark standard does not expire on a calendar cycle; it remains in force until a superseding standard is adopted through the network's standards update process, documented in the Network Update Log.

These standards are distinct from promotional or marketing criteria. A provider meeting network quality benchmarks has demonstrated licensure currency, jurisdiction match, and service category accuracy — not customer satisfaction scores or commercial performance metrics.

How it works

Benchmark evaluation operates across 4 primary dimensions:

Licensing verification — Confirmation that a referenced provider holds an active, jurisdiction-appropriate license at the time of listing. Licensing databases from state contractor boards, electrical licensing authorities, and plumbing boards serve as the primary verification sources. No provider listing is benchmarked as compliant if license status cannot be confirmed against a named public registry.
Credential currency — The benchmark requires that any professional designation, certification, or continuing education requirement reflected in a provider's profile corresponds to a currently valid credential. Organizations such as NIST and trade-specific credentialing bodies publish renewal schedules that establish the baseline currency windows applied here.
Geographic scope accuracy — Providers and member sites must accurately reflect the states and metropolitan service areas in which a given professional is authorized to operate. The Vertical Coverage Map tracks jurisdictional boundaries by trade category across all 50 states.
Data integrity — Source data must be traceable to a named public body or official registry. The Network Data Integrity Policy governs how member sites handle discrepancies, stale records, and conflict between source registries.

Member sites are evaluated against all 4 dimensions on a rolling basis. A site that fails the geographic scope accuracy dimension — for example, by listing a contractor as active in a state where their license has lapsed — triggers a remediation process outlined in the Network Compliance Requirements framework.

Common scenarios

Licensing discrepancy between states. A licensed plumber holding a master plumber license in Texas is not automatically benchmarked as compliant for listings in California, which maintains a separate state licensing board with independent examination and bonding requirements. National Plumbing Authority provides the trade-specific reference structure for jurisdictional plumbing standards, distinguishing between reciprocity states and non-reciprocity states across the country.

HVAC certification expiration. An HVAC technician whose EPA Section 608 certification — required for refrigerant handling under 40 CFR Part 82 — has lapsed does not meet the credential currency benchmark regardless of business tenure. National HVAC Authority maps the intersection of federal certification requirements and state-level HVAC licensing, which vary across more than 30 states with independent licensing frameworks.

Electrical contractor scope mismatch. A licensed electrical contractor authorized for residential work in one jurisdiction may not hold the commercial endorsement required for multi-unit or industrial projects. National Electrical Authority documents how these endorsement distinctions operate across state electrical boards, providing the reference layer that prevents scope misrepresentation in provider listings.

Roofing contractor without active bond. In states requiring contractor bonding as a condition of licensure, a roofing contractor whose bond has lapsed fails the licensing verification benchmark even if the underlying license remains technically active. National Roof Authority covers the bonding and insurance requirements that attach to roofing contractor licensing across the jurisdictions where roofing is a separately licensed trade.

Pool contractor operating outside certified scope. Pool and aquatics work in states such as California and Florida requires distinct contractor classifications. National Pool Authority provides the classification reference for C-53 pool contractor licensing in California and equivalent designations in other major pool-service markets.

Decision boundaries

Network quality benchmarks apply binary outcomes at the provider level: a provider either meets the benchmark threshold or does not. Partial compliance — such as holding 3 of 4 required credentials — does not produce a partial rating; it produces a non-compliant designation until all threshold requirements are satisfied.

The boundary between a benchmark evaluation and a site-level editorial judgment is defined in the Authority Designation Explained reference. Benchmark compliance is mechanical and source-dependent; authority designation involves a secondary layer of content and structural criteria.

Benchmarks do not apply retroactively to historical listings unless those listings are actively refreshed. A provider record last verified in a prior cycle is flagged as unverified, not as non-compliant, until re-evaluation occurs. This distinction matters when cross-referencing records across the Member Directory and individual vertical sites.

The Provider Listing Standards page defines the minimum data fields required for a listing to enter benchmark evaluation. Records missing required fields — such as license number, issuing authority, or expiration date — are excluded from benchmark scoring entirely.

References

On this site

Core Topics

Contact

Contact

Other Pages